International Journal on Science and Technology

E-ISSN: 2229-7677   •   Impact Factor: 9.88

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 16 Issue 3 July-September 2025 Submit your research before last 3 days of September to publish your research paper in the issue of July-September.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 16 Issue 3
July-September 2025

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

When Due Process Bends: is Male Captus, Bene Detentus Still Justifiable in Modern Justice of Grave Offences?

Author(s) Dr. MURANGIRA B. Thierry
Country Rwanda
Abstract The doctrine of male captus, bene detentus translated as “wrongly captured, lawfully detained” raises legal questions among legal scholar and practitioners about the balance between administration of justice and individual rights. Though controversial, it has been upheld in various jurisdictions to allow prosecution despite irregular or unlawful arrest, so long as fair trial standards are met. Courts in Alvarez-Machain (U.S.) and Eichmann (Israel) endorsed this approach, while the UK’s decision in Bennett rejected it on rule of law grounds.
International tribunals have also engaged the doctrine. The ICTY in Nikolić and the ICTR in Ntakirutimana and Barayagwiza allowed trials to proceed despite questionable transfers, emphasizing the fairness of proceedings over the legality of apprehension. The ICC, by contrast, operates under the Rome Statute and places greater emphasis on lawful surrender and state cooperation, though it has tolerated minor procedural irregularities, as in Ongwen’s case.
Given Rwanda’s persistent challenges in extraditing genocide suspects and addressing cross-border crimes, this article argues for a cautious, rights-based reinforcement of male captus, bene detentus through judicial decisions. Such a move could strengthen Rwanda’s capacity to hold fugitives accountable while aligning with international practice. However, robust safeguards must be in place to prevent abuse and protect human rights. Properly constrained, the doctrine could serve justice without compromising legal integrity.
Keywords male captus, bene detentus, wrongfully arrested, properly detained, genocide fugitives,
Published In Volume 16, Issue 3, July-September 2025
Published On 2025-07-13
DOI https://doi.org/10.71097/IJSAT.v16.i3.6754
Short DOI https://doi.org/g9s9wd
View / Download PDF File

Share this


CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJSAT DOI prefix is
10.71097/IJSAT

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 16 Isu 3Cover Page Vol 16 Isu 2Cover Page Vol 16 Isu 1

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJSAT
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us Message on WhatsApp +91-9687-182-185 editor@ijsat.org